[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01C80F.8070605@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:46:39 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: make the threshold of enabling THP configurable
于 2011年06月22日 17:16, Mel Gorman 写道:
>
> What I meant was that there is a rational reason why 512M is the
> default for enabling THP by default. Tuning it lower than that by any
> means makes very little sense. Tuning it higher might make some sense
> but it is more likely that THP would simply be disabled via sysctl. I
> see very little advantage to introducing this Kconfig option other
> than as a source of confusion when running make oldconfig.
>
The tunable range is (512, 8192), so 512M is the minimum.
Sure, I knew it can be disabled via /sys, actually we can do even
more in user-space, that is totally move the 512M check out of kernel,
why we didn't?
In short, I think we should either remove the 512M from kernel, or
make 512M to be tunable.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists