[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin6eFqQLb-Wkq=Q7rbm7GCjKtz8zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:50:28 +0300
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
davinci-linux-open-source
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.lugo@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] remoteproc: add omap implementation
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> wrote:
>
>> +/* bootaddr isn't needed for the dual M3's */
>> +static inline int omap_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, u64 bootaddr)
>
>> +static inline int omap_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> These two functions don't need to be inline as far as I can see.
They definitely don't need to. Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists