[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinubW6Pq7NHrpeG2pLf8SC3xLFdGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:27:23 +0530
From: Mohammed Shafi <shafi.wireless@...il.com>
To: Fred Matthews <fredmm@...mail.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net, ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org,
susinder@....qualcomm.com, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Disabling the third antenna for AR9380 in ath9k
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Fred Matthews <fredmm@...mail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I used that command to disable the third antenna, and applied it to both AP
> and STA AR9380 NICs.
> I then performed an IPerf test between both and then captured the statistics
> from the sender, (below) .
> You can see that in rc_stats (minstrel), the rate control actually
> "attempts" sending on 3 stream MCSs (16-23) around 256 times each.
just a guess. as we are changing the chain mask via debugfs and there
may be a chance we may not have informed the minstrel rate control
which is maintained in upper layer(mac80211) and it might be taking
what we have configured the chain masks while we had initialized the
device and i have very little idea about ministrel rate control
>
> Is there any way to prevent the RC from even attempting those rates, as if I
> where to fully imitate an AR9280, it shouldnt attempt at those MCSs.
may be we can try with ath9k rate control, and see what happens which
is within the ath9k driver and affects xmit.c and it may have been
informed of the chain mask change.
>
> Can Susinders comments also be detailed.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/netdev\:wlan0/stations/00\MAC/
>
> AUTH
> ASSOC
> AUTHORIZED
> WME
> ht supported
> cap: 0x11ce
> HT20/HT40
> SM Power Save disabled
> RX HT40 SGI
> TX STBC
> RX STBC 1-stream
> Max AMSDU length: 7935 bytes
> DSSS/CCK HT40
> ampdu factor/density: 3/6
> MCS mask: ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> MCS tx params: 1
> 792
> 150 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff 60 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
> a40
> -77
> 0
> type rate throughput ewma prob this prob this succ/attempt
> success attempts
> HT20/LGI MCS0 6.6 99.9 100.0 0( 0) 163
> 230
> HT20/LGI MCS1 13.1 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 75
> 75
> HT20/LGI MCS2 19.3 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 252
> 252
> HT20/LGI MCS3 25.4 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 75
> 75
> HT20/LGI MCS4 36.2 97.5 100.0 0( 0) 413
> 474
> HT20/LGI MCS5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 76
> HT20/LGI MCS6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 80
> HT20/LGI MCS7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS8 13.1 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 75
> 75
> HT20/LGI MCS9 25.4 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 70
> 70
> HT20/LGI MCS10 34.2 92.2 100.0 0( 0) 79
> 82
> HT20/LGI MCS11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 76
> HT20/LGI MCS12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS13 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 75
> HT20/LGI MCS17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 68
> HT20/LGI MCS18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 85
> HT20/LGI MCS19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 257
> HT20/LGI MCS20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT20/LGI MCS23 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS0 13.6 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 75
> 75
> HT40/LGI MCS1 26.5 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 72
> 72
> HT40/LGI MCS2 38.3 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 73
> 73
> HT40/LGI MCS3 49.7 99.9 100.0 0( 0) 70
> 73
> HT40/LGI MCS4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 10
> 1220
> HT40/LGI MCS5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS8 26.2 98.9 100.0 0( 0) 73
> 74
> HT40/LGI MCS9 49.3 99.2 100.0 0( 0) 67
> 69
> HT40/LGI MCS10 20.5 28.9 0.0 0( 0) 14
> 255
> HT40/LGI MCS11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 257
> HT40/LGI MCS12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS13 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 74
> HT40/LGI MCS17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 255
> HT40/LGI MCS19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/LGI MCS23 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS0 15.1 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 70
> 70
> HT40/SGI MCS1 29.2 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 72
> 72
> HT40/SGI t MCS2 38.5 91.3 100.0 0( 0) 81
> 83
> HT40/SGI PMCS3 54.3 99.5 100.0 0( 0) 66536
> 67803
> HT40/SGI MCS4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS8 29.2 100.0 100.0 0( 0) 67
> 67
> HT40/SGI T MCS9 54.6 99.9 100.0 0( 0) 310227
> 312339
> HT40/SGI MCS10 22.7 29.3 100.0 0( 0) 14
> 46.8 Mbits/sec 255
> HT40/SGI MCS11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 255
> HT40/SGI MCS13 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 68
> HT40/SGI MCS17 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 255
> HT40/SGI MCS19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS20 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS21 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
> HT40/SGI MCS23 0.0 0.0 0.0 0( 0) 0
> 256
>
> Total packet count:: ideal 365056 lookaround 13702
> Average A-MPDU length: 5.4
>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:25:36 +0530
>> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Disabling the third antenna for AR9380 in ath9k
>> From: shafi.wireless@...il.com
>> To: fredmm@...mail.co.uk
>> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
>> ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net; ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org;
>> susinder@....qualcomm.com
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Fred Matthews <fredmm@...mail.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I am installing the AR9380 NIC on laptops, but some only have two UFL
>> > connectors, and thus I was wondering if using only two of the UFL
>> > antenna
>> > ports will have any negative effect or difference than installing a 2x2
>> > NIC
>> > (AR9280 for example which has only 2 ports anyway). Please kindly
>> > explain
>> > with references if possible.
>> > Also for example is there anyway to disable transmission on the third
>> > UFL
>> > port (antenna) from ath9k or otherwise.
>> > Thank you all very much
>>
>> you can change the tx/rx chainmask for 3x3 AR9380 to disable
>> transmission on the third antenna
>> cd /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k# echo 0x3 > tx_chainmask
>> cd /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k# echo 0x3 > rx_chainmask
>>
>> after this, ideally it should operate as 2x2 device as per Susinders
>> comments. but if you got AR9280 please try to use that if 2 antenna is
>> the constraint.
>>
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ath9k-devel mailing list
>> > ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org
>> > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> shafi
>
--
shafi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists