[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E023142.1080605@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:15:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, mingo@...e.hu, rick@...rein.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
On 06/22/2011 04:18 AM, Stefan Assmann wrote:
>
> The idea is to allow the user to specify RAM addresses that shouldn't be
> touched by the OS, because they are broken in some way. Not all machines have
> hardware support for hwpoison, ECC RAM, etc, so here's a solution that allows to
> use bitmasks to mask address patterns with the new "badram" kernel command line
> parameter.
> Memtest86 has an option to generate these patterns since v2.3 so the only thing
> for the user to do should be:
> - run Memtest86
> - note down the pattern
> - add badram=<pattern> to the kernel command line
>
We already support the equivalent functionality with
memmap=<address>$<length> for those with only a few ranges... this has
been supported for ages, literally. For those with a lot of ranges,
like Google, the command line is insufficient.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists