[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E024FC5.6020707@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:25:41 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, mingo@...e.hu,
rick@...rein.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Michael Ditto <mditto@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
On 06/22/2011 12:15 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:05:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/22/2011 11:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>
>>> You'll always have multiple ways. Whatever magic you come up for
>>> the google BIOS or for EFI won't help the majority of users with
>>> old crufty legacy BIOS.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think this has anything to do with this.
>
> Please elaborate.
>
> How would you pass the bad page information instead in a fully backwards
> compatible way?
>
Depends on what you mean with "fully backward compatible". In some ways
this is a nonsense statement since if we create anything new older
kernels will not run.
However, the other discussions in this thread have been about injecting
data in kernel-specific data structures and thus aren't dependent on the
firmware layer used.
The fully backward compatible way is "memmap=<address>$<length>".
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists