[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8739j1lemc.fsf@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:50:51 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 7/8] PM / Domains: System-wide transitions support for generic domains (v3)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> Make generic PM domains support system-wide power transitions
> (system suspend and hibernation). Add suspend, resume, freeze, thaw,
> poweroff and restore callbacks to be associated with struct
> generic_pm_domain objects and make pm_genpd_init() use them as
> appropriate.
>
> The new callbacks do nothing for devices belonging to power domains
> that were powered down at run time (before the transition).
Great, this is the approach I prefer too, but...
Now I'm confused. Leaving runtime suspended devices alone is what I was
doing in my subsystem but was told not to. According to
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg50690.html
"it's generally agreed that _all_ devices should return to full
power during system resume -- even if they were runtime suspended
before the system sleep."
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists