[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E01816A.3040309@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:45:14 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: completely disable THP by transparent_hugepage=0
于 2011年06月22日 11:24, David Rientjes 写道:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>>>> Introduce "transparent_hugepage=0" to totally disable THP.
>>>> "transparent_hugepage=never" means setting THP to be partially
>>>> disabled, we need a new way to totally disable it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why can't you just compile it off so you never even compile
>>> mm/huge_memory.c in the first place and save the space in the kernel image
>>> as well? Having the interface available to enable the feature at runtime
>>> is worth the savings this patch provides, in my opinion.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/20/506
>>
>
> If you're proposing a patch for a specific purpose, it's appropriate to
> include that in the changelog.
Sorry, I can't put everything you don't see into the changelog.
>
> But now that I know what you're proposing this for, it's an easy NACK:
> transparent_hugepage=0 has no significant benefit over
> transparent_hugepage=never for kdump because the memory savings is
> negligible.
I hate to repeat things, sorry, please go for the other thread where I
replied to Andrea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists