linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing the packed attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E018A70.1060706@ahsoftware.de>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:23:44 +0200
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
CC:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...e.de, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: use packed,aligned(4) instead of removing
 the packed attribute

Hello,

On 21.06.2011 22:41, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> ... and also in this case, I was talking about proper use of the packed 
> attribute in general, not at all about a specific case.  I wanted to 
> provide a broader view to some people who expressed doubts and 
> misunderstanding in the hope that the archive could keep this knowledge 
> base available.
> 
> I apologize if that wasn't clear to you.

If you meant the abomination writing one, thanks, but I never expressed
doubts or misunderstandings.

I said doubts may arise because the standard (C99) doesn't say anything
about if or how structs are packed (or aligned).

Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/