[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E018CE3.7070101@snapgear.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:34:11 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k
tree
Hi Stephen,
On 22/06/11 11:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h between commit 17c74432b88e
> ("m68k/bitops: Make bitmap data pointer of atomic ops volatile") from the
> m68k tree and commit 2cb0d89e66b1 ("m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu
> bitops.h") from the m68knommu tree.
>
> The latter effectively deletes in the file and in doing the merge,
> removes the funtions that were modified by the former commit. So I just
> removed the file.
That would be right. The changes that Geert's patch makes are in
my merge patch.
Geert: do you want me to hold of on merging the bitops.h files?
Regards
Greg
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@...pgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists