[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110623104507.2e36aff3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:45:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2011-06-22-13-05 uploaded
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:05:19 -0700 akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2011-06-22-13-05 has been uploaded to
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> It contains the following patches against 3.0-rc4:
>
> memcg-fix-node_start-end_pfn-definition-for-mm-page_cgroupc.patch
> mm-move-vmtruncate_range-to-truncatec.patch
> mm-move-shmem-prototypes-to-shmem_fsh.patch
> tmpfs-take-control-of-its-truncate_range.patch
> tmpfs-add-shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp.patch
> drivers-rtc-rtc-ds1307c-add-support-for-rtc-device-pt7c4338.patch
> um-add-asm-percpuh.patch
> romfs-fix-romfs_get_unmapped_area-param-check.patch
> include-linux-compath-declare-compat_sys_sendmmsg.patch
> drivers-misc-lkdtmc-fix-race-when-crashpoint-is-hit-multiple-times-before-checking-count.patch
> mm-memory-failurec-fix-spinlock-vs-mutex-order.patch
> mm-fix-assertion-mapping-nrpages-==-0-in-end_writeback.patch
> taskstats-dont-allow-duplicate-entries-in-listener-mode.patch
> drm-ttm-use-shmem_read_mapping_page.patch
> drm-i915-use-shmem_read_mapping_page.patch
> drm-i915-use-shmem_truncate_range.patch
> drm-i915-more-struct_mutex-locking.patch
> drm-i915-more-struct_mutex-locking-fix.patch
> mm-cleanup-descriptions-of-filler-arg.patch
> mm-truncate-functions-are-in-truncatec.patch
> mm-tidy-vmtruncate_range-and-related-functions.patch
> mm-consistent-truncate-and-invalidate-loops.patch
> mm-pincer-in-truncate_inode_pages_range.patch
> tmpfs-no-need-to-use-i_lock.patch
> mm-nommuc-fix-remap_pfn_range.patch
As an experiment, I have applied all the above patches (everything
between origin.patch and linux-next.patch exclusive) to my "fixes" tree
so that they will be in linux-next immediately after Linus' tree and
before anything else. I am assuming that these patches are going to be
sent to Linus shortly (if you haven't already). I will point the
akpm-start branch of linux-next to be just after the above patches (so
akpm-start..akpm-end will contain everything else in linux-next).
If this is a problem, let me know and I will drop them again. Otherwise,
they will disappear from my tree when Linus' takes tham from you.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists