[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110623212736.74bea79a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:27:36 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc3
Hi Geert,
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:30:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:19:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to build with `make -k', so it continues in case
> > of an error, and
> > tries to build as much as possible?
> > Yes, I know this may increase build time considerably, but in an ideal
> > world, there
> > are no compile errors and everything is built anyway ;-)
>
> Done (I think - it required very simple changes to a Python script and I
> only do "monkey see, monkey do" Python programming :-))
I also made the mistake of fixing things so that the automatic "git
bisect for build failures" would work. That was taking much too much
time (over 4 hours for one build), so I have turned it off. Hopefully,
the builds will now run in a more reasonable time frame.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists