[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <017201cc3144$74e343d0$5ea9cb70$@com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:25:37 +0900
From: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>
To: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: Add I2C control support for S5M8751
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:51:57PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> If the device doesn't support SPI this could just as well be merged into
> the main driver - the reason for splitting with devices that support
> both is that it gives more flexibility with what gets built into the
> core kernel when both APIs are enabled.
Thank for your comment,
We have a few PMIC (S5M8751, S5M8752 and others).
They have different features. And Each one will have separate core file.
But i2c interface is same.
So, I try to separate i2s code.
I would modify prefix like s5m87xx.
> > +static int s5m8751_i2c_read_device(struct s5m8751 *s5m8751, uint8_t
reg,
> > + uint8_t *val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(s5m8751->i2c_client, reg);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(s5m8751->dev, "failed reading at 0x%02x\n", reg);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + *val = (uint8_t)ret;
>
> Why is this case required?
I want pass the read value by val
Thanks and regards,
SB Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists