linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: move active pages to inactive list with POSIX_FADV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110623133904.GA1479@thinkpad>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:39:04 +0200
From:	Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Jerry James <jamesjer@...terlinux.com>,
	Marcus Sorensen <marcus@...ehost.com>,
	Matt Heaton <matt@...ehost.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: move active pages to inactive list with
 POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:10:47AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> 
> > 
> > With the following solution when posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) is
> > called for an active page instead of removing it from the page cache it
> > is added to the tail of the inactive list. Otherwise, if it's already in
> > the inactive list the page is removed from the page cache.
> 
> 
> Have you thought about this heuristic?   If the page is active, try to
> remove it from the current process's page table.  If that drops the
> use count of the page to zero, then drop it from the page cache;
> otherwise, leave it alone.
> 
> That way, if the page is being used by anyone else, we don't touch
> the page at all.   fadvise() should only affect the current process; if
> it's available to non-root users, it shouldn't be affecting other
> processes, and if it is being actively used by some other process,
> removing it from their page tables so it can be put on the inactive
> list counts as interference, doesn't it?

If the page is mapped in other process page tables we don't touch the
page at all (see lru_deactivate_fn in mm/swap.c).

So the heuristic above it's already implemented. I should have said this
explicitly in my description...

-Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/