linux-kernel - Re: __packed vs. __attribute_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:57:57 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: __packed vs. __attribute__((packed)) in kernel headers

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:02 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.06.23 at 09:42 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2011-06-22 08:34 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > One possible solution would be to let the "scripts/headers_install.pl"
> > > script automatically substitute __packed with __attribute__((packed)):
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.pl b/scripts/headers_install.pl
[]
> I'm not an expert of Perl regular expressions, but maybe this:
>  $line =~ s/\s__packed;$/ __attribute__((packed));/g
> is a little bit closer to the intention?

Maybe:

s/\b__packed\b/__attribute__((packed))/g

though this argues against redefining
gcc __attributes__ in the first place. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/