linux-kernel - Re: __packed vs. __attribute_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTimO1xvGUQyUbEPn3U230Hr4-M+RQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:54:46 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: __packed vs. __attribute__((packed)) in kernel headers

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:34, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> One possible solution would be to let the "scripts/headers_install.pl"
> script automatically substitute __packed with __attribute__((packed)):

until we install compiler.h and friends, this is probably the only way
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/