[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E02BEFB.2030508@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:20:11 -0700
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] spi-dw: Ensure fifo lenght is set.
On 06/22/2011 08:55 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:00 PM,<dirk.brandewie@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Dirk Brandewie<dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
>>
>> Bug on fifo_len not being set. The fifo sizing routine does not work
>> since the txfltr register can not be written while the controller is
>> enabled. The max value of txfltr can be larger than the fifo. The
>> register allows values upto 0x3f (63) the fifo depth on the Intel
>> SOC's if 40
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie<dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-dw.c | 18 ++----------------
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
>> index ad92826..cc38aa0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw.c
>> @@ -776,25 +776,11 @@ static int destroy_queue(struct spi_dw *dws)
>> /* Restart the controller, disable all interrupts, clean rx fifo */
>> static void spi_dw_hw_init(struct spi_dw *dws)
>> {
>> + BUG_ON(!dws->fifo_len);
>> +
>
> Ditto here. BUG is too big a reaction. Fail to initialize the
> device, sure, and print a warning, but don't BUG.
Ack, I was trying to make sure the bug got caught while I was working towards
getting the rest of my changes in.
--Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists