[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308912470.1536.1.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:17:50 +0530
From: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] dma: remove DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:37 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 11:00 AM, Américo Wang wrote:
> >
> > git grep shows there are no users in tree, so we can
> > remove them safely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
>
> Oh, my __deprecated hack goes away. Nice :).
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 -------
> > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 21 ---------------------
> > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> > index 72e2384..8e2d816 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> > @@ -474,13 +474,6 @@ Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> >
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > -What: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros
> > -When: Jun 2011
> > -Why: DMA_xxBIT_MASK macros were replaced with DMA_BIT_MASK() macros.
> > -Who: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > -
> > -----------------------------
> > -
> > What: iwlwifi disable_hw_scan module parameters
> > When: 2.6.40
> > Why: Hareware scan is the prefer method for iwlwifi devices for
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > index ba8319a..dc77808 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -54,27 +54,6 @@ struct dma_map_ops {
> >
> > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
> >
> > -typedef u64 DMA_nnBIT_MASK __deprecated;
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * NOTE: do not use the below macros in new code and do not add new definitions
> > - * here.
> > - *
> > - * Instead, just open-code DMA_BIT_MASK(n) within your driver
> > - */
> > -#define DMA_64BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> > -#define DMA_48BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(48)
> > -#define DMA_47BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(47)
> > -#define DMA_40BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(40)
> > -#define DMA_39BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(39)
> > -#define DMA_35BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(35)
> > -#define DMA_32BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
> > -#define DMA_31BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(31)
> > -#define DMA_30BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(30)
> > -#define DMA_29BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(29)
> > -#define DMA_28BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(28)
> > -#define DMA_24BIT_MASK (DMA_nnBIT_MASK)DMA_BIT_MASK(24)
> > -
> > #define DMA_MASK_NONE 0x0ULL
> >
> > static inline int valid_dma_direction(int dma_direction)
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists