[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1308926697-22475-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:44:53 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Stop kswapd consuming 100% CPU when highest zone is small
(Built this time and passed a basic sniff-test.)
During allocator-intensive workloads, kswapd will be woken frequently
causing free memory to oscillate between the high and min watermark.
This is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, if the highest zone is
small, a problem occurs.
This seems to happen most with recent sandybridge laptops but it's
probably a co-incidence as some of these laptops just happen to have
a small Normal zone. The reproduction case is almost always during
copying large files that kswapd pegs at 100% CPU until the file is
deleted or cache is dropped.
The problem is mostly down to sleeping_prematurely() keeping kswapd
awake when the highest zone is small and unreclaimable and compounded
by the fact we shrink slabs even when not shrinking zones causing a lot
of time to be spent in shrinkers and a lot of memory to be reclaimed.
Patch 1 corrects sleeping_prematurely to check the zones matching
the classzone_idx instead of all zones.
Patch 2 avoids shrinking slab when we are not shrinking a zone.
Patch 3 notes that sleeping_prematurely is checking lower zones against
a high classzone which is not what allocators or balance_pgdat()
is doing leading to an artifical believe that kswapd should be
still awake.
Patch 4 notes that when balance_pgdat() gives up on a high zone that the
decision is not communicated to sleeping_prematurely()
This problem affects 2.6.38.8 for certain and is expected to affect
2.6.39 and 3.0-rc4 as well. If accepted, they need to go to -stable
to be picked up by distros and this series is against 3.0-rc4. I've
cc'd people that reported similar problems recently to see if they
still suffer from the problem and if this fixes it.
mm/vmscan.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
1.7.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists