[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E04C5EC.2090602@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:14:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rick van Rein <rick@...rein.org>
CC: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Craig Bergstrom <craigb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"rdunlap@...otime.net" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
On 06/24/2011 09:56 AM, Rick van Rein wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Does it scale? [...] Perhaps we may end up with a composite solution.
>
> If I had my way, there would be an extension to the e820 format to allow
> the BadRAM patterns to be specified. Since the extension with bad page
> information is specific to boot loader interaction, this would work in
> exactly those cases that are covered by the current situation.
>
Yes, a different table might be worthwhile.
Another question, however, is what does this look like at runtime. In
particular, if I'm not mistaken hwpoison will create struct pages for
these non-memory pages, which seems undesirable...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists