[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=39V3MeQi9T9X8g1O7g0w6FNLGyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:09:14 -0700
From: Craig Bergstrom <craigb@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>> I don't think it makes sense to handle something like that with a list.
>> The compact representation currently in badram is great for that.
>
> I'd tend to agree here. Rick has made a convincing argument that there
> are significant numbers of real world cases where a defective row/column
> in a DIMM results in a predictable pattern of errors. The ball is now
> in Google's court to take a look at their systems that have high numbers
> of errors to see if they can actually be described by a small number
> of BadRAM patterns as Rick has claimed.
>
Hi All,
We (Google) are working on a data-driven answer for this question. I
know that there has been some analysis on this topic on the past, but
I don't want to speculate until we've had some time to put all the
pieces together. Stay tuned for specifics.
Cheers,
CraigB
> -Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists