| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110624190441.GA2164@BohrerMBP.rgmadvisors.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:04:41 -0500
From: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: High IRQ usage on CPU 0
Running 3.0.0-rc4+ I noticed I'm seeing the following on an idle Dell
r610 system:
Cpu0 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 64.3%id, 0.0%wa, 35.7%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu4 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu5 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu6 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu7 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu8 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu9 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu10 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu11 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu12 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu13 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu14 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Cpu15 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Watching /proc/interrupts it looks like most of the interrupts on CPU0
are on IRQ 0 from "IO-APIC-edge timer".
perf top -C 0 shows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PerfTop: 1024 irqs/sec kernel:100.0% exact: 0.0% [1000Hz cycles], (all, CPU: 0)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
samples pcnt function DSO
_______ _____ ___________________________________ _______
11648.00 83.6% default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys vmlinux
1548.00 11.1% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave vmlinux
530.00 3.8% intel_idle vmlinux
36.00 0.3% hpet_legacy_next_event vmlinux
28.00 0.2% tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast vmlinux
20.00 0.1% find_next_bit vmlinux
16.00 0.1% find_busiest_group vmlinux
15.00 0.1% _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore vmlinux
13.00 0.1% cpuidle_idle_call vmlinux
10.00 0.1% _raw_spin_lock vmlinux
9.00 0.1% tick_broadcast_oneshot_control vmlinux
8.00 0.1% notifier_call_chain vmlinux
7.00 0.1% leave_mm vmlinux
For some reason 'perf record -C 0 -g sleep 5' doesn't record anything,
but here is the top functions from a 'perf record -a -g sleep 5':
# Events: 77K cycles
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ............... .................. ...................................
#
80.22% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
|
--- _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
|
|--89.92%-- clockevents_notify
| intel_idle
| cpuidle_idle_call
| cpu_idle
| |
| |--98.67%-- start_secondary
| |
| --1.33%-- rest_init
| start_kernel
| x86_64_start_reservations
| x86_64_start_kernel
|
|--10.03%-- tick_broadcast_oneshot_control
| tick_notify
| notifier_call_chain
| raw_notifier_call_chain
| clockevents_notify
| intel_idle
| cpuidle_idle_call
| cpu_idle
| |
| |--99.97%-- start_secondary
| --0.03%-- [...]
--0.05%-- [...]
9.32% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys
|
--- default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys
physflat_send_IPI_mask
lapic_timer_broadcast
tick_do_broadcast
tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
timer_interrupt
handle_irq_event_percpu
handle_irq_event
handle_edge_irq
handle_irq
do_IRQ
common_interrupt
|
|--99.91%-- cpuidle_idle_call
| cpu_idle
| rest_init
| start_kernel
| x86_64_start_reservations
| x86_64_start_kernel
--0.09%-- [...]
5.83% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle
|
--- intel_idle
|
|--99.67%-- cpuidle_idle_call
| cpu_idle
| |
| |--94.19%-- start_secondary
| |
| --5.81%-- rest_init
| start_kernel
| x86_64_start_reservations
| x86_64_start_kernel
--0.33%-- [...]
I'm not sure what other information would be useful here. Please let
me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------
This email, along with any attachments, is confidential. If you
believe you received this message in error, please contact the
sender immediately and delete all copies of the message.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists