linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroups: Start a basic rlimit subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTikiRfwtvwVmq+aGvzK38XcyGXgeFZjUkx+OmjAo2O0rjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:18:00 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] cgroups: Start a basic rlimit subsystem

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Agreed about future rlimit options, but building a single purpose
> numtask subsystem looks a bit strange. Just because it looks too much
> single purpose.

Admittedly most subsystems do have more knobs and features, but I
don't think it's unreasonable for a subsystem to provide just a single
feature. In theory the overhead is going to be very low.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/