linux-kernel - Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110624161029.e8f96175.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:10:29 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc3

Hi Geert,

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:08:06 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> > I also made the mistake of fixing things so that the automatic "git
> > bisect for build failures" would work.  That was taking much too much
> > time (over 4 hours for one build), so I have turned it off.  Hopefully,
> > the builds will now run in a more reasonable time frame.
> 
> Yeah, I noticed it. There are still no results for 3.0-rc4...

3.0-rc4 should be complete in a few hours.  Hopefully rc5 will be faster.

> Probably you should only bisect for configs that where "green" recently.
> And hope people fix reported regressions the-next-day-as-we-speak :-)

Well, I will leave that for the author :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped