[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ade2577-044b-4391-a607-91a4a989c3ff@email.android.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:15:42 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] x86: convert ticketlocks to C and remove duplicate code
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>On 06/24/2011 02:50 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/23/2011 06:19 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> I've been running with this code in place for several months on 4
>core
>>> systems without any problems.
>>>
>>> I couldn't measure a consistent performance difference between the
>two
>>> implemenations; there seemed to be +/- ~1% +/-, which is the level
>of
>>> variation I see from simply recompiling the kernel with slightly
>>> different code alignment.
>>>
>>> Overall, I think the large reduction in code size is a big win.
>>>
>> Could you give us the delta in *compiled* code size?
>
>Sure. Do you mean for the individual lock sequences, or for the
>overall
>kernel?
>
> J
Overall is fine.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists