[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:35:13 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vwool@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (mtd + of)
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/24/11 13:26, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:04 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:58:22 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20110623:
> >>>
> >>> My fixes tree includes:
> >>> (as an experiment) the early part of mmotm-2011-06-22-13-05
> >>> STAGING: Comedi: Build only on arches providing PAGE_KERNEL_NOCACHE
> >>
> >>
> >> When CONFIG_MTD=m, CONFIG_MTD_OF_PARTS=y:
> >>
> >> drivers/mtd/ofpart.o: In function `init_module':
> >> ofpart.c:(.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
> >> drivers/mtd/mtdcore.o:(.init.text+0x43): first defined here
> >
> > I guess this is some old issue? I do not think ofpart can be compiled-in
> > if the mtd core is a module...
>
> [adding driver author, Vitaly]
>
> No, it's a current issue.
I meant that the subject suggests this is about linux-next, but this
problem should be in upstream.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists