[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1106252235560.10907-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Block races between runtime PM and system
sleep
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I'm still not clear on why the error handler needs to run at this time.
> >
> > Because SATA ports are suspended with the help of the SCSI error handling
> > mechanism (which Tejun claims is the best way to do that).
> I've carried out this exercise to see how complicated it is going to be
> and it doesn't really seem to be _that_ complicated. The appended patch
> illustrates this, but it hasn't been tested, so caveat emptor.
The patch is straightforward enough. But will it be sufficient?
Suppose a SATA port is already in runtime suspend when the system sleep
starts. Will the error handler be able to do its special job? I don't
know... It may turn out to be necessary for the SATA port to be
runtime resumed somewhere along the line.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists