linux-kernel - [PATCH resend 1/6] ext4: use proper little-endian bitops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1309067876-3537-2-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:57:51 +0900
From:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH resend 1/6] ext4: use proper little-endian bitops

ext4_{set,clear}_bit() is defined as __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le()
for ext4.  Only two ext4_{set,clear}_bit() calls check the return
value. The rest of calls ignore the return value and they can be
replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le().

This changes ext4_{set,clear}_bit() from __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le()
to __{set,clear}_bit_le() and introduces ext4_test_and_{set,clear}_bit()
for the two places where old bit needs to be returned.

This ext4_{set,clear}_bit() change is considered safe, because if someone
uses these macros without noticing the change, new ext4_{set,clear}_bit
don't have return value and causes compiler errors where the return
value is used.

This also removes unused ext4_find_first_zero_bit().

Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h   |    7 ++++---
 fs/ext4/ialloc.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 1921392..cb65177 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -930,12 +930,13 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
 #define test_opt2(sb, opt)		(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt2 & \
 					 EXT4_MOUNT2_##opt)
 
-#define ext4_set_bit			__test_and_set_bit_le
+#define ext4_test_and_set_bit		__test_and_set_bit_le
+#define ext4_set_bit			__set_bit_le
 #define ext4_set_bit_atomic		ext2_set_bit_atomic
-#define ext4_clear_bit			__test_and_clear_bit_le
+#define ext4_test_and_clear_bit		__test_and_clear_bit_le
+#define ext4_clear_bit			__clear_bit_le
 #define ext4_clear_bit_atomic		ext2_clear_bit_atomic
 #define ext4_test_bit			test_bit_le
-#define ext4_find_first_zero_bit	find_first_zero_bit_le
 #define ext4_find_next_zero_bit		find_next_zero_bit_le
 #define ext4_find_next_bit		find_next_bit_le
 
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index 21bb2f6..e3de479 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void ext4_free_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 		fatal = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh2);
 	}
 	ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
-	cleared = ext4_clear_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data);
+	cleared = ext4_test_and_clear_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data);
 	if (fatal || !cleared) {
 		ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
 		goto out;
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int ext4_claim_inode(struct super_block *sb,
 	 */
 	down_read(&grp->alloc_sem);
 	ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
-	if (ext4_set_bit(ino, inode_bitmap_bh->b_data)) {
+	if (ext4_test_and_set_bit(ino, inode_bitmap_bh->b_data)) {
 		/* not a free inode */
 		retval = 1;
 		goto err_ret;
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/