linux-kernel - Broke affinity for irq %i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110627134705.1bd95126@endymion.delvare>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:47:05 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Broke affinity for irq %i

Hi all,

Could someone familiar with function arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:fixup_irqs()
please add log levels to messages "Broke affinity for irq %i\n" and
"Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n"? As I put a few cores offline today
because of high temperature (not sure if it really helps, but that's a
different story) I got the following messages in my kernel log:

Broke affinity for irq 72
Broke affinity for irq 71
Broke affinity for irq 75
Broke affinity for irq 74

Due to the lack of log level for these messages, I have no idea if
there is something really wrong that I should report, or if this is a
mere informational message, or even a debug message which shouldn't be
printed at all by default. I would like this to be clarified.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/