| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110627134239.GA10808@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:42:39 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com> CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, "lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU (TunnelCreek)? On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:20:51AM -0400, Alexander Stein wrote: > Hello, > > I have a patch (for v2.6.39) which adds support for Intel Atom E6XX > (TunnelCreek) to coretemp. It's merely only adding x86_model 0x26. > But there are models (e.g. E660 and E660T) with different TjMax, namely 90 > degrees C and 110 degrees C. But these different model can't be detected by > reading from hardware. > IMO there should be some support to adjust the temperature from userspace. > Reading Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface only temp1_offset seems to be > useable. But I think it is somewhat misleading (especially on multicores), > because there must only be one offset. > What do you think about this? > You can adjust the reported temperature with an entry in sensors3.conf. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists