[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309252313.6701.177.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:11:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/16] sched: unthrottle cfs_rq(s) who ran out of quota
at period refresh
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 21:40 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> >> + if (unlikely(runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires))
> >> + goto out_unlock;
> >
> > it might help to explain how, runtime_expires is taken from cfs_b after
> > calling __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime, and we're in the replenishment
> > timer, so nobody is going to be adding new runtime.
> >
>
> Good idea -- thanks
Aside from being a good idea, I'm genuinely puzzled by that part and
would love having it explained :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists