[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110628181215.GA15843@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:12:15 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AppArmor: Fix masking of capabilities in complain
mode
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:56:05PM +0100, John Johansen wrote:
> AppArmor is masking the capabilities returned by capget against the
> capabilities mask in the profile. This is wrong, in complain mode the
> profile has effectively all capabilities, as the profile restrictions are
> not being enforced, merely tested against to determine is an access is
> known by the profile.
>
> This can result in the wrong behavior of security conscience applications
> like sshd which examine their capability set, and change their behavior
> accordingly. In this case because of the masked capability set being
> returned sshd fails due to DAC checks, even when the profile is complain
> mode.
>
> Kernels affected: 2.6.36 - 3.0
>
> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
As this should probably go to the stable tree, next time care to add a
simple:
Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
to the signed-off-by: area of the patch so it gets automagically
included in the stable and longterm kernels as needed when it hits
Linus's tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists