[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110628140219.1480dc7a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:02:19 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"Wey-Yi Guy" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c between commits 1107a08a1a3e
("iwlagn: fix cmd queue unmap"), e815407d395e ("iwlagn: map command
buffers BIDI") and 2627c002cbed ("iwlagn: use PCI_DMA_* for pci_*
operations") from the wireless-current tree and commit 795414db8607
("iwlagn: don't use the PCI wrappers for DMA operation") from the net
tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c
index 9eee978,fd8aee9..0000000
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-tx.c
@@@ -126,9 -126,8 +126,8 @@@ static inline u8 iwl_tfd_get_num_tbs(st
}
static void iwlagn_unmap_tfd(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_cmd_meta *meta,
- struct iwl_tfd *tfd)
+ struct iwl_tfd *tfd, enum dma_data_direction dma_dir)
{
- struct pci_dev *dev = priv->pci_dev;
int i;
int num_tbs;
@@@ -150,8 -149,8 +149,8 @@@
/* Unmap chunks, if any. */
for (i = 1; i < num_tbs; i++)
- pci_unmap_single(dev, iwl_tfd_tb_get_addr(tfd, i),
+ dma_unmap_single(priv->bus.dev, iwl_tfd_tb_get_addr(tfd, i),
- iwl_tfd_tb_get_len(tfd, i), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ iwl_tfd_tb_get_len(tfd, i), dma_dir);
}
/**
@@@ -167,8 -166,7 +166,8 @@@ void iwlagn_txq_free_tfd(struct iwl_pri
struct iwl_tfd *tfd_tmp = txq->tfds;
int index = txq->q.read_ptr;
- iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, &txq->meta[index], &tfd_tmp[index]);
+ iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, &txq->meta[index], &tfd_tmp[index],
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
++ DMA_TO_DEVICE);
/* free SKB */
if (txq->txb) {
@@@ -311,8 -309,10 +310,8 @@@ void iwl_cmd_queue_unmap(struct iwl_pri
i = get_cmd_index(q, q->read_ptr);
if (txq->meta[i].flags & CMD_MAPPED) {
- dma_unmap_single(priv->bus.dev,
- dma_unmap_addr(&txq->meta[i], mapping),
- dma_unmap_len(&txq->meta[i], len),
+ iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, &txq->meta[i], &txq->tfds[i],
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
txq->meta[i].flags = 0;
}
@@@ -693,12 -698,11 +692,12 @@@ int iwl_enqueue_hcmd(struct iwl_priv *p
continue;
if (!(cmd->dataflags[i] & IWL_HCMD_DFL_NOCOPY))
continue;
- phys_addr = pci_map_single(priv->pci_dev, (void *)cmd->data[i],
- cmd->len[i], PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- if (pci_dma_mapping_error(priv->pci_dev, phys_addr)) {
+ phys_addr = dma_map_single(priv->bus.dev, (void *)cmd->data[i],
- cmd->len[i], DMA_TO_DEVICE);
++ cmd->len[i], DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ if (dma_mapping_error(priv->bus.dev, phys_addr)) {
iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, out_meta,
- &txq->tfds[q->write_ptr]);
+ &txq->tfds[q->write_ptr],
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
++ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
idx = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
@@@ -802,7 -806,7 +801,7 @@@ void iwl_tx_cmd_complete(struct iwl_pri
cmd = txq->cmd[cmd_index];
meta = &txq->meta[cmd_index];
- iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, meta, &txq->tfds[index], PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
- iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, meta, &txq->tfds[index]);
++ iwlagn_unmap_tfd(priv, meta, &txq->tfds[index], DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
/* Input error checking is done when commands are added to queue. */
if (meta->flags & CMD_WANT_SKB) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists