linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/29] gma500: Ensure the frame buffer has a linear virtual mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110628211859.GA23217@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:18:59 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/29] gma500: Ensure the frame buffer has a linear
 virtual mapping

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> We need this for the framebuffer in order to ensure that the kernel
> framebuffer layer can handle it when using KMS. Except for the base
> framebuffer this isn't a concern.
> 
> Add an npage field to the gtt as too many copies of the page calculation
> are getting spread around the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c  |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h  |    1 +
>  drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c |   18 ++++++---------
>  drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h |    5 ++--
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

This doesn't apply:

patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.c
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_fb.h
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 120.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 149.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 193.
4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.c.rej
patching file drivers/staging/gma500/psb_gtt.h

Any ideas?

Is there drm changes in linux-next for this driver that I don't have?

If so, maybe we need to just start sending these patches through that tree?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/