linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4]PPC4xx: Adding PCI(E) MSI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309302928.32158.470.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:15:28 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Ayman El-Khashab <ayman@...hashab.com>
Cc:	Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@...c.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	rsarmah@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4]PPC4xx: Adding PCI(E) MSI support

On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:31 -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote:
> > > +static int ppc4xx_setup_pcieh_hw(struct platform_device *dev,
> > > +                            struct resource res, struct
> ppc4xx_msi *msi)
> > > +{
> > > +
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > +
> > > +   msi->msi_dev = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "ppc4xx-msi");
> > > +   if (msi->msi_dev)
> > > +           return -ENODEV;
> 
> This does not look correct. I guess it should probably read 
> 
> if (!msi->msi_dev) .....

Indeed, that looks bogus. Rupjyoti, please test and send fixes if
necessary, obviously this code has not been tested.

This is not part of the bits I fixed up so I looks to me like the
original patch was wrong (and thus obviously untested !!!)

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/