linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: vmscan: Evaluate the watermarks against the correct classzone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTik16=kYyNtK-h-z3Ex64yPHUHFnVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:23:10 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"P?draig Brady" <P@...igbrady.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: vmscan: Evaluate the watermarks against the
 correct classzone

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 03:53:04PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>> > When deciding if kswapd is sleeping prematurely, the classzone is
>> > taken into account but this is different to what balance_pgdat() and
>> > the allocator are doing. Specifically, the DMA zone will be checked
>> > based on the classzone used when waking kswapd which could be for a
>> > GFP_KERNEL or GFP_HIGHMEM request. The lowmem reserve limit kicks in,
>> > the watermark is not met and kswapd thinks its sleeping prematurely
>> > keeping kswapd awake in error.
>>
>>
>> I thought it was intentional when you submitted a patch firstly.
>
> It was, it also wasn't right.
>
>> "Kswapd makes sure zones include enough free pages(ie, include reserve
>> limit of above zones).
>> But you seem to see DMA zone can't meet above requirement forever in
>> some situation so that kswapd doesn't sleep.
>> Right?
>>
>
> Right.
>
>> >
>> > Reported-and-tested-by: Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> > ---
>> >  mm/vmscan.c |    2 +-
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > index 9cebed1..a76b6cc2 100644
>> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> > @@ -2341,7 +2341,7 @@ static bool sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining,
>> >                }
>> >
>> >                if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order, high_wmark_pages(zone),
>> > -                                                       classzone_idx, 0))
>> > +                                                       i, 0))
>>
>> Isn't it  better to use 0 instead of i?
>>
>
> I considered it but went with i to compromise between making sure zones
> included enough free pages without requiring that ZONE_DMA meet an
> almost impossible requirement when under continual memory pressure.

I see.
Thanks, Mel.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/