| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106281919310.2142@xanadu.home> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:24:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net> To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] ARM: make mach/hardware.h optional On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Rob Herring wrote: > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com> > > Currently, all ARM platforms must have a mach/hardware.h include. This is > because it is ultimately included by linux/pci.h which is included in many > places even for !CONFIG_PCI. > > This could be fixed simply with an ifdef around the include of mach/hardware.h > in asm/pci.h. However, in the interest of fixing this for single kernel > binary builds, this series removes the include of mach/hardware.h outside of > mach-* and plat-*. What's used from hardware.h is a couple of PCI defines. > Converting them to variables allows each platform to set the values as needed. Excellent ! This is certainly moving things in the right direction. For the 4 patches, you can add: Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> Obviously for patch 1/4 it would be nice to have the opinion of the PCI maintainer as well. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists