[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309303561.27467.9.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:26:01 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@...e.fr>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend] coredump: call vfs_getattr() to get inode
attributes
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 23:19 +0200, Arnaud Giersch wrote:
> From: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@...e.fr>
>
> In do_coredump(), call vfs_getattr() to get inode attributes, and do not
> get them directly from the fields of the inode struct.
>
> Without this patch, when dumping core on an NFSv4 mount, and the i_uid
> field is not correctly filled at open time, the uid check fails, and an
> empty core dump is produced.
>
> This apparently only happens when there was no "core" file before the
> dump. If a "core" file owned by the current user is already present, it
> is correctly filled.
>
> The reason is that decode_attr_owner() in fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c is not
> allowed to call the idmapper when it receives may_sleep = 0 (see commit
> 80e52aced138bb41b045a8595a87510f27d8d8c5, and some explanations in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/33391).
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Giersch <arnaud.giersch@...e.fr>
This wants to be fixed in the NFS layer, not the VFS.
What we should do is the following:
1. Save the string versions of user@...ain/group@...ain in the
struct nfs4_opendata so that we can resolve them from the
process context in _nfs4_proc_open().
2. Fix nfs4_atomic_open() so that it revalidates any inode that has
the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag set.
Cheers
Trond
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists