[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110629194421.090c9f1c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:44:21 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/29] gma500: revamp frame buffer creation and handling
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:38:59 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:04:30 +0100
> Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Restructure this to work the same way as the i915 frame buffer does. That
> > cleans up various chunks of code.
> >
> > We can now set a mode in modetest but mode restore is a bit iffy
>
> Note that modetest doesn't do the VT dance, so if you don't clean
> things up in your ->lastclose the right mode probably won't come back.
Yes I figured that and its a later patch. Really the core DRI code ought
to do this - it has the knowledge to sort the mess out (it knows how to
do it for sysrq-v)
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists