[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309377708.26417.41.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:01:48 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Dima Zavin <dima@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plist: add mutex to the blessed lock type for plists
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:33 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/plist.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> @@ -56,11 +57,14 @@ static void plist_check_list(struct list_head *top)
>
> static void plist_check_head(struct plist_head *head)
> {
> - WARN_ON(head != &test_head && !head->rawlock && !head->spinlock);
> + WARN_ON(head != &test_head && !head->rawlock && !head->spinlock &&
> + !head->mutex);
> if (head->rawlock)
> WARN_ON_SMP(!raw_spin_is_locked(head->rawlock));
> if (head->spinlock)
> WARN_ON_SMP(!spin_is_locked(head->spinlock));
> + if (head->mutex)
> + WARN_ON_SMP(!mutex_is_locked(head->mutex));
Spin locks are NOPs on SMP, but mutexes are not. Are you sure you want
this as WARN_ON_SMP()?
-- Steve
> if (!plist_head_empty(head))
> plist_check_list(&plist_first(head)->prio_list);
> plist_check_list(&head->node_list);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists