[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110629140630.5aefdda8.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:06:30 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.0-rc5 (ssize_t ???)
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:13:17 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> *** WARNINGS ***
>
> 358 regressions:
> + drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 4 has type 'ssize_t': => 210
> + drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/usb-fw.c: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 8 has type 'ssize_t': => 222
> + drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmchar.c: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 2 has type 'ssize_t': => 146
> + drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmchar.c: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 3 has type 'ssize_t': => 146
> + net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c: warning: format '%Zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 2 has type 'ssize_t': => 708
> + net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 3 has type 'ssize_t': => 690
Can someone explain these warnings, please? (signed size_t vs. ssize_t)
Is gcc confused?
Looks like a compiler issue to me.
thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists