linux-kernel - Re: [BUG?]3.0-rc4+ftrace+kprobe: set kprobe at instruction 'stwu' lead to system crash/freeze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110629064635.GB678@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:16:35 +0530
From:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	paulus@...ba.org, galak@...nel.crashing.org,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [BUG?]3.0-rc4+ftrace+kprobe: set kprobe at instruction 'stwu'
	lead to system crash/freeze

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:23:28PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
> <ananth@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:47:13PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> (2011/06/24 19:29), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:21 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> When I use kprobe to do something, I found some wired thing.
> >> >>
> >> >> When CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is disabled:
> >> >> (gdb) disassemble do_fork
> >> >> Dump of assembler code for function do_fork:
> >> >>    0xc0037390 <+0>:        mflr    r0
> >> >>    0xc0037394 <+4>:        stwu    r1,-64(r1)
> >> >>    0xc0037398 <+8>:        mfcr    r12
> >> >>    0xc003739c <+12>:       stmw    r27,44(r1)
> >> >>
> >> >> Then I:
> >> >> modprobe kprobe_example func=do_fork offset=4
> >> >> ls
> >> >> Things works well.
> >> >>
> >> >> But when CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is enabled:
> >> >> (gdb) disassemble do_fork
> >> >> Dump of assembler code for function do_fork:
> >> >>    0xc0040334 <+0>:        mflr    r0
> >> >>    0xc0040338 <+4>:        stw     r0,4(r1)
> >> >>    0xc004033c <+8>:        bl      0xc00109d4 <mcount>
> >> >>    0xc0040340 <+12>:       stwu    r1,-80(r1)
> >> >>    0xc0040344 <+16>:       mflr    r0
> >> >>    0xc0040348 <+20>:       stw     r0,84(r1)
> >> >>    0xc004034c <+24>:       mfcr    r12
> >> >> Then I:
> >> >> modprobe kprobe_example func=do_fork offset=12
> >> >> ls
> >> >> 'ls' will never retrun. system freeze.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure if x86 had a similar issue.
> >> >
> >> > Masami, have any ideas to why this happened?
> >>
> >> No, I don't familiar with ppc implementation. I guess
> >> that single-step resume code failed to emulate the
> >> instruction, but it strongly depends on ppc arch.
> >> Maybe IBM people may know what happened.
> >>
> >> Ananth, Jim, would you have any ideas?
> >
> > On powerpc, we emulate sstep whenever possible. Only recently support to
> > emulate loads and stores got added. I don't have access to a powerpc box
> > today... but will try to recreate the problem ASAP and see what could be
> > happening in the presence of mcount.
> 
> After taking more testing on it, it looks like the issue doesn't
> depend on mcount
> (AKA. CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)
> 
> As I said in the first email, with eldk-5.0 CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=n
> will work well.
> 
> But when I'm using eldk-4.2[1], both will fail. But the funny thing is when I
> set kprobe at several functions some works fine but some will fail. For example,
> at this time do_fork() works well, but show_interrupt() will crash.

Certain functions are off limits for probing -- look for __kprobe
annotations in the kernel. Some such functions are arch specific, but
show_interrupts() would definitely not be one of them. It works fine on
my (64bit) test box.

At this time, I think your best bet is to work with the eldk folks to
narrow down the problem. Given the current set of data, I am inclined to
think it could be an eldk bug, not a kernel one.

Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/