linux-kernel - Re: possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201106301527.19539.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:27:19 +0200
From:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops"?

On Thursday 30 June 2011 10:33:23 Alexander Stein wrote:
> BTW: I noticed that in 2.6.39.2 independently from this patch revert this
> bridge didn't show up RUNNING ifconfg. Is this intended? Another bridge I
> have, which doesn't use (R)STP, is shown as RUNNING like before.

This change was caused by commit 1faa4356a3bd89ea11fb92752d897cff3a20ec0e 
"bridge: control carrier based on ports online". It prevents the bridge from 
actually receiving/sending packets. Reverting restores the old behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/