linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110630155634.GE3249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:56:35 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MFD: MAX8997: IRQ definition moved to public header.

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 05:00:13PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:

> In our code:
> http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung/blob/eba500212699c0ad8d6bde0dc01c3ec7101f8154:/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-charger.c
> around line 85, it specifies which interrupt is going to be a
> wakeup-source ("true"), how the power-managing S/W should interpret
> them.

This looks like charger specific configuration which should be done by
the charger driver rather than by directly working with the IRQs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/