linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: Implement strict user copy checks for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E0CCD4C.1090801@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:23:56 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: Implement strict user copy checks for x86_64

On 06/30/2011 12:19 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:14:32 -0700
> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> Strict user copy checks are only really supported on x86_32 even
>> though the config option is selectable on x86_64. Add the
>> necessary support to the 64 bit code to trigger copy_from_user()
>> warnings at compile time.
>
> So I'm getting 20-30 warnings from an x86_64 allmodconfig build.
>
> I don't think we want a million other people to have to put up with
> those warnings too.  Can you please take a look at fixing these up?
>

Care to share the warnings? I'll run a build again and fix any new
warnings I find.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/