| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BANLkTikEigJk0nzyhXsWKWGSJQBbTVSerg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:45:11 -0500 From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com> To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PWM: add pwm framework support Sascha: On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote: > So please don't complain too much: We are currently only doing the work > you didn't want to do. Per request of some the early reviewers, my plan was to migrate existing users over to the new API after the API itself was committed to mainstream. At any rate, this isn't a question of work I didn't "want" to do. On the one hand, I was simply doing what was asked of me. On the other hand, I was trying to make progress while simultaneously dealing with serious family matters that are still unresolved. At any rate, it's clear that your patches are going in, and mine aren't--- I have no choice but to accept that. I'm just frustrated by the duplication of effort. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@...lgatliff.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists