[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110630194754.GG22707@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:47:54 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Abhishek Kane <v-abkane@...rosoft.com>,
Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/40] Staging: hv: storvsc: Fixup srb_status for INQUIRY
and MODE_SENSE
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:39:35AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> The current handler on the Windows Host does not correctly handle
> INQUIRY and MODE_SENSE commands with some options. Fixup srb_status
> in these cases since the failure is not fatal.
> + /*
> + * The current SCSI handling on the host side does
> + * not correctly handle:
> + * INQUIRY command with page code parameter set to 0x80
> + * MODE_SENSE command with cmd[2] == 0x1c
> + *
> + * Setup srb status so this won't be fatal.
> + */
> +
> + if ((stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == INQUIRY) ||
> + (stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0] == MODE_SENSE))
> + vstor_packet->vm_srb.srb_status = 0;
Given that the srb_status is only used for debug printks I don't
quite see the point. If people explicitly turn on debugging they
should see that these commands fail, shouldn't they?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists