linux-kernel - Re: {PATCH] fix __packed in exported kernel headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:02:21 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: {PATCH] fix __packed in exported kernel headers

On 06/30/2011 12:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> Not unless the kernel uses its own namespace for these defines.  The
>> thing is, most libraries have their own macro library for this, and
>> collisions are both likely and bad.
> 
> while that's true for exporting compiler.h, namespacing is irrelevant
> to my requirement -- the headers should have sane/usable defaults.
> 

I have no idea what "your requirements" are, but as someone who has
actually implemented a C library on top of the Linux headers I can tell
you it's a very real and relevant issue, and that it is historically one
of the biggest problems.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/