[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309470866.12449.604.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:54:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM-GST: adjust scheduler cpu power
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> + if (static_branch((¶virt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
> + int is_idle;
> + u64 st;
> +
> + is_idle = ((rq->curr != rq->idle) ||
> + irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
Now that hurt my brain. If the vcpu is idle, why does it want to run?
How can an idle vcpu ever rack up steal time?
Also, what's that HARDIRQ_OFFSET bit about? sorely lacking in
explanation, and the Changelog to this patch is about as bad as the last
one.
> + __touch_steal_time(is_idle, delta, &st);
> +
> + steal = st * TICK_NSEC;
> +
> + delta -= steal;
> + }
> +#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists