[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E0BF998.7030800@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:20:40 -0700
From: "Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi" <bprakash@...adcom.com>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vladislav Zolotarov" <vladz@...adcom.com>,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the scsi tree
On 6/29/2011 7:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got conflicts in
> drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h and drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
> between commit 2382d2364a60 ("[SCSI] bnx2fc: Bumped version to 1.0.2")
> from the scsi tree and commit 619c5cb6885b ("New 7.0 FW: bnx2x, cnic,
> bnx2i, bnx2fc") from the net tree.
>
> I used the versions from the net tree as those version numbers were newer.
>
Stephen, can you please send the conflicts? Most probably you should
have seen the conflicts w.r.t version number in bnx2fc.h and date in
bnx2fc_fcoe.c. If that is the case, the versions from net tree are good.
Thanks,
Bhanu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists