[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110701085013.4e8cbb02.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:50:13 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"bsingharora@...il.com" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] memcg: export memory cgroup's swappiness v2
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:34 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:03:25 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Each memory cgroup has 'swappiness' value and it can be accessed by
> > get_swappiness(memcg). The major user is try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()
> > and swappiness is passed by argument. It's propagated by scan_control.
> >
> > get_swappiness is static function but some planned updates will need to
> > get swappiness from files other than memcontrol.c
> > This patch exports get_swappiness() as mem_cgroup_swappiness().
> > By this, we can remove the argument of swapiness from try_to_free...
> > and drop swappiness from scan_control. only memcg uses it.
>
> x86_64 allnoconfig (aka Documentation/SubmitChecklist, section 2b):
>
> mm/vmscan.c: In function 'vmscan_swappiness':
> mm/vmscan.c:1734: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_cgroup_swappiness'
>
> This is pretty broken. I think we do want to implement this for
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y, CONFIG_SWAP=n:
>
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h~memcg-export-memory-cgroups-swappiness-fix
> +++ a/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -365,17 +365,12 @@ static inline void put_swap_token(struct
> extern void
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t ent, bool swapout);
> extern int mem_cgroup_count_swap_user(swp_entry_t ent, struct page **pagep);
> -extern unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> #else
> static inline void
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_swapcache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t ent, bool swapout)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> -{
> - return vm_swappiness;
> -}
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
> extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_t ent);
> @@ -510,5 +505,15 @@ mem_cgroup_count_swap_user(swp_entry_t e
> #endif
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> +extern unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
> +#else
> +static inline unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> +{
> + return vm_swappiness;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__*/
> #endif /* _LINUX_SWAP_H */
>
> But what is the role of CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP?
>
> And in the above circumstances, vmscan_swappiness() devolves into
>
> static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
> return vm_swappiness;
> return vm_swappiness;
> }
>
> which I guess makes sense but seems a bit odd.
>
> Anyway, my confidence level is low so I think I'll drop this patch.
> Please have a think about the interplay between
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR, CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP and
> CONFIG_SWAP.
>
>
Ok, I'll check it. Maybe I miss !CONFIG_SWAP...
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists